| | | | | | |

Core i5-8365U vs i3-10100T


Description
The i5-8365U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8365U gets a score of 197.5 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.2 times faster than the i5-8365U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
a0653
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
59.73k points
60.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
197.46k points
227.67k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8365U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
24.37k
24.31k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
22.68k
22.15k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.98k
5.14k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.7k
8.46k (x1.1)
TOTAL
59.73k
60.06k (x1.01)

Multithread

i5-8365U

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
89.45k
101.48k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
85.57k
98.04k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.02k
24.28k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.41k
3.86k (x1.13)
TOTAL
197.46k
227.67k (x1.15)

Performance/W
i5-8365U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
5964 points/W
1561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/W
1508 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/W
374 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
227 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
13164 points/W
3503 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8365U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
5944 points/GHz
5653 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5531 points/GHz
5150 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1214 points/GHz
1196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1879 points/GHz
1967 points/GHz
TOTAL
14568 points/GHz
13967 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4