Core i5-8365U vs Ryzen 7 3750H
Description
The i5-8365U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the 3750H is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8365U gets a score of 197.5 k points while the 3750H gets 175.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8365U is 1.1 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8365U gets a score of 197.5 k points while the 3750H gets 175.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8365U is 1.1 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
810f81
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Picasso
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2019
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
59.73k points
46.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
197.46k points
175.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8365U
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.37k
13.72k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
22.68k
22.93k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.98k
4.99k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.7k
5.27k (x0.68)
TOTAL
59.73k
46.91k (x0.79)
Multithread
i5-8365U
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
89.45k
50.54k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
85.57k
93.33k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.02k
25.25k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.41k
6.07k (x1.78)
TOTAL
197.46k
175.18k (x0.89)
Performance/W
i5-8365U
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
5964 points/W
1444 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/W
2667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/W
721 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
227 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
13164 points/W
5005 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8365U
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
5944 points/GHz
3430 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5531 points/GHz
5733 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1214 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1879 points/GHz
1317 points/GHz
TOTAL
14568 points/GHz
11726 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4