Core i5-8365U vs Ryzen 5 1600
Description
The i5-8365U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8365U gets a score of 197.5 k points while the 1600 gets 303.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-8365U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8365U gets a score of 197.5 k points while the 1600 gets 303.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-8365U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
800f82
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2019
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
59.73k points
58.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
197.46k points
303.4k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8365U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
24.37k
14.08k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
22.68k
22.56k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.98k
5.19k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.7k
16.71k (x2.17)
TOTAL
59.73k
58.53k (x0.98)
Multithread
i5-8365U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
89.45k
86.62k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
85.57k
168.1k (x1.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.02k
43.51k (x2.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.41k
5.16k (x1.51)
TOTAL
197.46k
303.4k (x1.54)
Performance/W
i5-8365U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
5964 points/W
1333 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/W
2586 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/W
669 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
227 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
13164 points/W
4668 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8365U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
5944 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5531 points/GHz
6265 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1214 points/GHz
1440 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1879 points/GHz
4642 points/GHz
TOTAL
14568 points/GHz
16259 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4