| | | | | | |

Core i5-8365U vs Ryzen 3 3200G


Description
The i5-8365U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8365U gets a score of 197.5 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-8365U is 1.2 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
810f81
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
59.73k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
197.46k points
168.69k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8365U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
24.37k
14.48k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
22.68k
23.84k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.98k
5.43k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.7k
5.46k (x0.71)
TOTAL
59.73k
49.21k (x0.82)

Multithread

i5-8365U

3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
89.45k
54.39k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
85.57k
88.77k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.02k
20.04k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.41k
5.48k (x1.61)
TOTAL
197.46k
168.69k (x0.85)

Performance/W
i5-8365U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
5964 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
227 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
13164 points/W
2595 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8365U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
5944 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5531 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1214 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1879 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
14568 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4