| | | | | | |

Core i5-8300H vs Xeon E5-2667 v3


Description
The i5-8300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8300H gets a score of 182.5 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 1.9 times faster than the i5-8300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
306f2
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
45 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2018
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
56.72k points
41.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
182.47k points
343.64k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8300H
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
23.6k
20.99k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
21.72k
11.9k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
4.72k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
3.75k (x0.55)
TOTAL
56.72k
41.36k (x0.73)

Multithread

i5-8300H

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
79.12k
172.62k (x2.18)
Test#2 (FP)
81.27k
110.03k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.46k
44.06k (x2.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.62k
16.93k (x3.66)
TOTAL
182.47k
343.64k (x1.88)

Performance/W
i5-8300H
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1758 points/W
1279 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1806 points/W
815 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
326 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
4055 points/W
2545 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8300H
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
5899 points/GHz
5830 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5431 points/GHz
3305 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1152 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1699 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
TOTAL
14181 points/GHz
11489 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4