Core i5-8300H vs Xeon E3-1220 v3
Description
The i5-8300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the E3-1220 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8300H gets a score of 182.5 k points while the E3-1220 v3 gets 140.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8300H is 1.3 times faster than the E3-1220 v3 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8300H gets a score of 182.5 k points while the E3-1220 v3 gets 140.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8300H is 1.3 times faster than the E3-1220 v3 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
306c3
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Haswell-WS
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
4 /4
TDP
45 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2018
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
56.72k points
39.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
182.47k points
140.76k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8300H
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
23.6k
19.17k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
21.72k
10.55k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
4.79k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
4.65k (x0.68)
TOTAL
56.72k
39.16k (x0.69)
Multithread
i5-8300H
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
79.12k
73.13k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
81.27k
42.06k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.46k
18.03k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.62k
7.54k (x1.63)
TOTAL
182.47k
140.76k (x0.77)
Performance/W
i5-8300H
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1758 points/W
914 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1806 points/W
526 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
225 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
4055 points/W
1759 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8300H
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
5899 points/GHz
5478 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5431 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1152 points/GHz
1368 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1699 points/GHz
1328 points/GHz
TOTAL
14181 points/GHz
11188 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4