| | | | | | |

Core i5-8300H vs i5-7500


Description
The i5-8300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-7500 is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8300H gets a score of 182.5 k points while the i5-7500 gets 191.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7500 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-8300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
906e9
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Kaby Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2018
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
56.72k points
61.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
182.47k points
191.71k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8300H
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
23.6k
25.59k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
21.72k
22.57k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
5.27k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
8.08k (x1.19)
TOTAL
56.72k
61.51k (x1.08)

Multithread

i5-8300H

i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
79.12k
88.3k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
81.27k
78.59k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.46k
19.72k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.62k
5.1k (x1.11)
TOTAL
182.47k
191.71k (x1.05)

Performance/W
i5-8300H
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
1758 points/W
1358 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1806 points/W
1209 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
303 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
4055 points/W
2949 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8300H
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
5899 points/GHz
6734 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5431 points/GHz
5939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1152 points/GHz
1387 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1699 points/GHz
2125 points/GHz
TOTAL
14181 points/GHz
16186 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4