| | | | | | |

Core i5-8300H vs i5-6500


Description
The i5-8300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-6500 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8300H gets a score of 182.5 k points while the i5-6500 gets 179.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-8300H is 1 times faster than the i5-6500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
506e3
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2018
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
56.72k points
53.7k points
Mean multithread perf.
182.47k points
179.44k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8300H
i5-6500
Test#1 (Integers)
23.6k
22.89k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
21.72k
19.87k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
4.58k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
6.36k (x0.94)
TOTAL
56.72k
53.7k (x0.95)

Multithread

i5-8300H

i5-6500
Test#1 (Integers)
79.12k
84.36k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
81.27k
72.91k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.46k
16.08k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.62k
6.1k (x1.32)
TOTAL
182.47k
179.44k (x0.98)

Performance/W
i5-8300H
i5-6500
Test#1 (Integers)
1758 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1806 points/W
1122 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
247 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
4055 points/W
2761 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8300H
i5-6500
Test#1 (Integers)
5899 points/GHz
6359 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5431 points/GHz
5521 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1152 points/GHz
1271 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1699 points/GHz
1766 points/GHz
TOTAL
14181 points/GHz
14917 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4