Core i5-8300H vs i5-10210U
Description
The i5-8300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8300H gets a score of 182.5 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8300H is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8300H gets a score of 182.5 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8300H is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
806ec
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2018
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.72k points
55.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
182.47k points
145.51k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8300H
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
23.6k
23.11k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
21.72k
20.58k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
4.73k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
7.43k (x1.09)
TOTAL
56.72k
55.86k (x0.98)
Multithread
i5-8300H
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
79.12k
65.84k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
81.27k
60.77k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.46k
14.45k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.62k
4.44k (x0.96)
TOTAL
182.47k
145.51k (x0.8)
Performance/W
i5-8300H
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
1758 points/W
4389 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1806 points/W
4052 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
964 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
296 points/W
TOTAL
4055 points/W
9701 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8300H
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
5899 points/GHz
5503 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5431 points/GHz
4900 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1152 points/GHz
1127 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1699 points/GHz
1769 points/GHz
TOTAL
14181 points/GHz
13299 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4