Core i5-8300H vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
Description
The i5-8300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 4900HS is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8300H gets a score of 182.5 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 2 times faster than the i5-8300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8300H gets a score of 182.5 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 2 times faster than the i5-8300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
860f01
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Renoir
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
April 2018
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
56.72k points
53k points
Mean multithread perf.
182.47k points
360.57k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8300H
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
23.6k
14.87k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
21.72k
21.53k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
8.39k (x1.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
8.21k (x1.21)
TOTAL
56.72k
53k (x0.93)
Multithread
i5-8300H
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
79.12k
124.63k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
81.27k
158.62k (x1.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.46k
69.79k (x4)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.62k
7.53k (x1.63)
TOTAL
182.47k
360.57k (x1.98)
Performance/W
i5-8300H
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
1758 points/W
3561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1806 points/W
4532 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
1994 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
215 points/W
TOTAL
4055 points/W
10302 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8300H
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
5899 points/GHz
3457 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5431 points/GHz
5007 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1152 points/GHz
1952 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1699 points/GHz
1910 points/GHz
TOTAL
14181 points/GHz
12326 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4