Core i5-8300H vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Description
The i5-8300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8300H gets a score of 182.5 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.1 times faster than the i5-8300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8300H gets a score of 182.5 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.1 times faster than the i5-8300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
810f10
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2018
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
56.72k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
182.47k points
198.27k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8300H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
23.6k
14.2k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
21.72k
23.23k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
5.35k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
5.18k (x0.76)
TOTAL
56.72k
47.96k (x0.85)
Multithread
i5-8300H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
79.12k
58.24k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
81.27k
105.72k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.46k
28.73k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.62k
5.59k (x1.21)
TOTAL
182.47k
198.27k (x1.09)
Performance/W
i5-8300H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1758 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1806 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
4055 points/W
3050 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8300H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
5899 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5431 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1152 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1699 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
14181 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4