| | | | | | |

Core i5-8300H vs Ryzen 5 1600


Description
The i5-8300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8300H gets a score of 182.5 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-8300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
800f11
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2018
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
56.72k points
56.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
182.47k points
272.8k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8300H
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
23.6k
13.67k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
21.72k
22.28k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
4.99k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
15.22k (x2.24)
TOTAL
56.72k
56.16k (x0.99)

Multithread

i5-8300H

1600
Test#1 (Integers)
79.12k
81.03k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
81.27k
145.84k (x1.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.46k
39.14k (x2.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.62k
6.79k (x1.47)
TOTAL
182.47k
272.8k (x1.5)

Performance/W
i5-8300H
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
1758 points/W
1247 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1806 points/W
2244 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
602 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
4055 points/W
4197 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8300H
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
5899 points/GHz
3797 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5431 points/GHz
6189 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1152 points/GHz
1387 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1699 points/GHz
4228 points/GHz
TOTAL
14181 points/GHz
15601 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4