Core i5-8300H vs Ryzen 3 3350U
Description
The i5-8300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 3350U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8300H gets a score of 182.5 k points while the 3350U gets 144.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8300H is 1.3 times faster than the 3350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8300H gets a score of 182.5 k points while the 3350U gets 144.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8300H is 1.3 times faster than the 3350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
810f81
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2018
March 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.72k points
43.7k points
Mean multithread perf.
182.47k points
144.84k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8300H
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
23.6k
13.25k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
21.72k
21.67k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
4.79k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
3.98k (x0.59)
TOTAL
56.72k
43.7k (x0.77)
Multithread
i5-8300H
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
79.12k
46.47k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
81.27k
78.38k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.46k
16.69k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.62k
3.3k (x0.71)
TOTAL
182.47k
144.84k (x0.79)
Performance/W
i5-8300H
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
1758 points/W
3098 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1806 points/W
5225 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
1113 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
4055 points/W
9656 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8300H
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
5899 points/GHz
3787 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5431 points/GHz
6191 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1152 points/GHz
1369 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1699 points/GHz
1138 points/GHz
TOTAL
14181 points/GHz
12485 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4