| | | | | | |

Core i5-8300H vs Ryzen 3 3200U


Description
The i5-8300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 3200U is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8300H gets a score of 182.5 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-8300H is 3 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
810f81
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2018
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.72k points
38.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
182.47k points
61.23k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8300H
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
23.6k
11.13k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
21.72k
19.38k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
4.47k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
3.87k (x0.57)
TOTAL
56.72k
38.85k (x0.68)

Multithread

i5-8300H

3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
79.12k
17.13k (x0.22)
Test#2 (FP)
81.27k
30.56k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.46k
9.44k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.62k
4.09k (x0.89)
TOTAL
182.47k
61.23k (x0.34)

Performance/W
i5-8300H
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1758 points/W
1142 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1806 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
273 points/W
TOTAL
4055 points/W
4082 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8300H
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5899 points/GHz
3181 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5431 points/GHz
5536 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1152 points/GHz
1277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1699 points/GHz
1105 points/GHz
TOTAL
14181 points/GHz
11099 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4