Core i5-8265U vs Xeon E5-2670 v3
Description
The i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8265U gets a score of 143.2 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 3.2 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8265U gets a score of 143.2 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 3.2 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
306f2
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1528
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
12/24
TDP
15 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
30720 kB
Date
August 2018
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
46.67k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
143.23k points
452.9k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-8265U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3.68k
3.52k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
16.08k
8.68k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
2.83k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.95k
3.13k (x0.39)
TOTAL
32.69k
18.17k (x0.56)
Multithread
i5-8265U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
14.29k
32.7k (x2.29)
Test#2 (FP)
61.15k
105.18k (x1.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.53k
35.18k (x2.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.72k
9.54k (x2.56)
TOTAL
95.69k
182.59k (x1.91)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-8265U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
13.6k
11.08k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
20.03k
9.57k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.19k
3.18k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.05k
3.28k (x0.47)
TOTAL
45.87k
27.11k (x0.59)
Multithread
i5-8265U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
51.42k
139.07k (x2.7)
Test#2 (FP)
77.48k
133.47k (x1.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.65k
46.6k (x2.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
6.65k (x1.8)
TOTAL
149.24k
325.78k (x2.18)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-8265U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
13.66k
11.18k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
21.17k
10.06k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5k
3.21k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.11k
3.12k (x0.38)
TOTAL
47.94k
27.57k (x0.58)
Multithread
i5-8265U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
51.36k
140.98k (x2.74)
Test#2 (FP)
79.72k
145.37k (x1.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.61k
45.62k (x2.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
6.75k (x1.8)
TOTAL
151.44k
338.73k (x2.24)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8265U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
19.19k
18.62k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
17.47k
10.49k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.04k
4.04k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.97k
3.26k (x0.55)
TOTAL
46.67k
36.41k (x0.78)
Multithread
i5-8265U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
64.43k
236.25k (x3.67)
Test#2 (FP)
61.91k
151.05k (x2.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.36k
58.9k (x4.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.52k
6.7k (x1.9)
TOTAL
143.23k
452.9k (x3.16)
Performance/W
i5-8265U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4296 points/W
1969 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4128 points/W
1259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
890 points/W
491 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
235 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
9548 points/W
3774 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8265U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4920 points/GHz
6006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4478 points/GHz
3385 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1037 points/GHz
1303 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1531 points/GHz
1052 points/GHz
TOTAL
11966 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4