Core i5-8265U vs i5-8300H
Description
The i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the i5-8300H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8265U gets a score of 143.2 k points while the i5-8300H gets 182.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8300H is 1.3 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8265U gets a score of 143.2 k points while the i5-8300H gets 182.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8300H is 1.3 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
906ea
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA1528
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2018
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
46.67k points
56.72k points
Mean multithread perf.
143.23k points
182.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8265U
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
19.19k
23.6k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
17.47k
21.72k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.04k
4.61k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.97k
6.8k (x1.14)
TOTAL
46.67k
56.72k (x1.22)
Multithread
i5-8265U
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
64.43k
79.12k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
61.91k
81.27k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.36k
17.46k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.52k
4.62k (x1.31)
TOTAL
143.23k
182.47k (x1.27)
Performance/W
i5-8265U
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
4296 points/W
1758 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4128 points/W
1806 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
890 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
235 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
9548 points/W
4055 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8265U
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
4920 points/GHz
5899 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4478 points/GHz
5431 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1037 points/GHz
1152 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1531 points/GHz
1699 points/GHz
TOTAL
11966 points/GHz
14181 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4