| | | | | | |

Core i5-8265U vs i5-1038NG7


Description
The i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the i5-1038NG7 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8265U gets a score of 143.2 k points while the i5-1038NG7 gets 243.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1038NG7 is 1.7 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
706e5
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1528
FCBGA1344
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2018
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
46.67k points
65.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
143.23k points
243.18k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8265U
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
19.19k
23.2k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
17.47k
21.2k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.04k
9.4k (x2.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.97k
11.54k (x1.93)
TOTAL
46.67k
65.35k (x1.4)

Multithread

i5-8265U

i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
64.43k
94.68k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
61.91k
103.38k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.36k
35.79k (x2.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.52k
9.33k (x2.65)
TOTAL
143.23k
243.18k (x1.7)

Performance/W
i5-8265U
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
4296 points/W
3381 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4128 points/W
3692 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
890 points/W
1278 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
235 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
9548 points/W
8685 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8265U
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
4920 points/GHz
6106 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4478 points/GHz
5580 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1037 points/GHz
2473 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1531 points/GHz
3037 points/GHz
TOTAL
11966 points/GHz
17197 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4