| | | | | | |

Core i5-8265U vs i5-1035G1


Description
The i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8265U gets a score of 143.2 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 171.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
706e5
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1528
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2018
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
46.67k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
143.23k points
171.65k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-8265U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3.68k
3.88k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
16.08k
14.98k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
9.7k (x1.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.95k
8.6k (x1.08)
TOTAL
32.69k
37.15k (x1.14)

Multithread

i5-8265U

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
14.29k
14.61k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
61.15k
54.9k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.53k
27.58k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.72k
5.04k (x1.36)
TOTAL
95.69k
102.13k (x1.07)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-8265U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
13.6k
12.89k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
20.03k
18.55k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.19k
9.93k (x1.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.05k
9.54k (x1.35)
TOTAL
45.87k
50.91k (x1.11)

Multithread

i5-8265U

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
51.42k
50.06k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
77.48k
66.1k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.65k
20.24k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
5.51k (x1.5)
TOTAL
149.24k
141.91k (x0.95)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-8265U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
13.66k
13.58k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
21.17k
19.53k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5k
9.37k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.11k
9.23k (x1.14)
TOTAL
47.94k
51.7k (x1.08)

Multithread

i5-8265U

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
51.36k
56.25k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
79.72k
73.73k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.61k
29.56k (x1.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
5.39k (x1.44)
TOTAL
151.44k
164.94k (x1.09)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8265U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
19.19k
21.5k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
17.47k
17.71k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.04k
7.92k (x1.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.97k
8.24k (x1.38)
TOTAL
46.67k
55.37k (x1.19)

Multithread

i5-8265U

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
64.43k
73.03k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
61.91k
68.19k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.36k
24.89k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.52k
5.54k (x1.57)
TOTAL
143.23k
171.65k (x1.2)

Performance/W
i5-8265U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
4296 points/W
4869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4128 points/W
4546 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
890 points/W
1660 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
235 points/W
369 points/W
TOTAL
9548 points/W
11443 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8265U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
4920 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4478 points/GHz
4919 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1037 points/GHz
2201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1531 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
11966 points/GHz
15381 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4