| | | | | | |

Core i5-8265U vs Celeron G1610T


Description
The i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8265U gets a score of 149.2 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-8265U is 3.9 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
306a9
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1528
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/2
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2048 kB
Date
August 2018
December 2012
Mean monothread perf.
46.67k points
20.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
143.23k points
38.59k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-8265U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.68k
2.34k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
16.08k
6.54k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
3k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.95k
2.74k (x0.34)
TOTAL
32.69k
14.62k (x0.45)

Multithread

i5-8265U

G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.29k
4.67k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
61.15k
12.66k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.53k
5.95k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.72k
2.53k (x0.68)
TOTAL
95.69k
25.8k (x0.27)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-8265U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.6k
7.87k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
20.03k
7.14k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.19k
3.04k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.05k
2.79k (x0.4)
TOTAL
45.87k
20.84k (x0.45)

Multithread

i5-8265U

G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
51.42k
15.12k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
77.48k
14.05k (x0.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.65k
5.94k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
3.48k (x0.94)
TOTAL
149.24k
38.59k (x0.26)

Performance/W
i5-8265U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
3428 points/W
432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5165 points/W
401 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1110 points/W
170 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
246 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
9949 points/W
1103 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8265U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
3487 points/GHz
3423 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5135 points/GHz
3102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1332 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1808 points/GHz
1211 points/GHz
TOTAL
11762 points/GHz
9060 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4