Core i5-8265U vs Ryzen 5 3400G
Description
The i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the 3400G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8265U gets a score of 143.2 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3400G is 1.4 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8265U gets a score of 143.2 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3400G is 1.4 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
810f81
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Picasso
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2018
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
46.67k points
50.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
143.23k points
200.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8265U
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
19.19k
14.58k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
17.47k
23.98k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.04k
5.35k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.97k
6.34k (x1.06)
TOTAL
46.67k
50.25k (x1.08)
Multithread
i5-8265U
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
64.43k
57.37k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
61.91k
107.03k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.36k
28.9k (x2.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.52k
7.05k (x2)
TOTAL
143.23k
200.34k (x1.4)
Performance/W
i5-8265U
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
4296 points/W
883 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4128 points/W
1647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
890 points/W
445 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
235 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
9548 points/W
3082 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8265U
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
4920 points/GHz
3471 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4478 points/GHz
5710 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1037 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1531 points/GHz
1509 points/GHz
TOTAL
11966 points/GHz
11965 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4