Core i5-8265U vs Ryzen 3 2200G
Description
The i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the 2200G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8265U gets a score of 143.2 k points while the 2200G gets 157.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200G is 1.1 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8265U gets a score of 143.2 k points while the 2200G gets 157.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200G is 1.1 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
810f10
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2018
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
46.67k points
44.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
143.23k points
157.54k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8265U
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
19.19k
13.75k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
17.47k
22.58k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.04k
4.99k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.97k
3.55k (x0.59)
TOTAL
46.67k
44.87k (x0.96)
Multithread
i5-8265U
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
64.43k
50.99k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
61.91k
84.4k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.36k
18.95k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.52k
3.2k (x0.91)
TOTAL
143.23k
157.54k (x1.1)
Performance/W
i5-8265U
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
4296 points/W
785 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4128 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
890 points/W
292 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
235 points/W
49 points/W
TOTAL
9548 points/W
2424 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8265U
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
4920 points/GHz
3716 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4478 points/GHz
6102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1037 points/GHz
1350 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1531 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
TOTAL
11966 points/GHz
12126 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4