Core i5-8265U vs i5-10400F
Description
The i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8265U gets a score of 149.5 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 2.6 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8265U gets a score of 149.5 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 2.6 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806eb
a0655
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16386 kB
Date
August 2018
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
57.57k points
72.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
149.48k points
390.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8265U
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
24.32k
28.39k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
20.35k
24.89k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.38k
5.78k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.52k
13.19k (x1.55)
TOTAL
57.57k
72.25k (x1.25)
Multithread
i5-8265U
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
65.17k
180.2k (x2.77)
Test#2 (FP)
63.6k
163.51k (x2.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.4k
40.6k (x2.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.31k
6.48k (x1.03)
TOTAL
149.48k
390.78k (x2.61)
Performance/W
i5-8265U
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4345 points/W
2772 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4240 points/W
2515 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
960 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
9965 points/W
6012 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8265U
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6235 points/GHz
6603 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5219 points/GHz
5788 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1124 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2183 points/GHz
3067 points/GHz
TOTAL
14762 points/GHz
16803 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4