Core i5-8265U vs i5-1035G1
Description
The i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8265U gets a score of 149.5 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 171.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8265U gets a score of 149.5 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 171.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806eb
706e5
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Ice Lake-U
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2018
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
57.57k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
149.48k points
171.65k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8265U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
24.32k
21.5k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
20.35k
17.71k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.38k
7.92k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.52k
8.24k (x0.97)
TOTAL
57.57k
55.37k (x0.96)
Multithread
i5-8265U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
65.17k
73.03k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
63.6k
68.19k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.4k
24.89k (x1.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.31k
5.54k (x0.88)
TOTAL
149.48k
171.65k (x1.15)
Performance/W
i5-8265U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
4345 points/W
4869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4240 points/W
4546 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
960 points/W
1660 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
369 points/W
TOTAL
9965 points/W
11443 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8265U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
6235 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5219 points/GHz
4919 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1124 points/GHz
2201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2183 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
14762 points/GHz
15381 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4