Core i5-8265U vs Ryzen 7 5800H
Description
The i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the 5800H is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8265U gets a score of 149.5 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800H is 2.9 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8265U gets a score of 149.5 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800H is 2.9 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806eb
a50f00
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Cezanne
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
August 2018
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
57.57k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
149.48k points
426.9k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8265U
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.32k
20.37k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
20.35k
22.52k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.38k
10.18k (x2.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.52k
21.49k (x2.52)
TOTAL
57.57k
74.56k (x1.29)
Multithread
i5-8265U
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
65.17k
144.01k (x2.21)
Test#2 (FP)
63.6k
191.86k (x3.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.4k
84.53k (x5.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.31k
6.5k (x1.03)
TOTAL
149.48k
426.9k (x2.86)
Performance/W
i5-8265U
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
4345 points/W
3200 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4240 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
960 points/W
1878 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
9965 points/W
9487 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8265U
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
6235 points/GHz
4630 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5219 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1124 points/GHz
2314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2183 points/GHz
4883 points/GHz
TOTAL
14762 points/GHz
16944 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4