Core i5-8265U vs Ryzen 5 3400G
Description
The i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the 3400G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8265U gets a score of 149.5 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3400G is 1.3 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8265U gets a score of 149.5 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3400G is 1.3 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806eb
810f81
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Picasso
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2018
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
57.57k points
50.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
149.48k points
200.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8265U
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
24.32k
14.58k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
20.35k
23.98k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.38k
5.35k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.52k
6.34k (x0.74)
TOTAL
57.57k
50.25k (x0.87)
Multithread
i5-8265U
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
65.17k
57.37k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
63.6k
107.03k (x1.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.4k
28.9k (x2.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.31k
7.05k (x1.12)
TOTAL
149.48k
200.34k (x1.34)
Performance/W
i5-8265U
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
4345 points/W
883 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4240 points/W
1647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
960 points/W
445 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
9965 points/W
3082 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8265U
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
6235 points/GHz
3471 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5219 points/GHz
5710 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1124 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2183 points/GHz
1509 points/GHz
TOTAL
14762 points/GHz
11965 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4