| | | | | | |

Core i5-8250U vs i9-10940X


Description
The i5-8250U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i9-10940X is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 161.3 k points while the i9-10940X gets 1088.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10940X is 6.7 times faster than the i5-8250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ea
50657
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Cascade Lake-X
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
4/8
14/28
TDP
15 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
14x32+14x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
14x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
19712 kB
Date
August 2017
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
54.31k points
72.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
161.26k points
1088.11k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8250U
i9-10940X
Test#1 (Integers)
22.11k
29.75k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
19.64k
27.44k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.54k
5.81k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.03k
9.05k (x1.13)
TOTAL
54.31k
72.04k (x1.33)

Multithread

i5-8250U

i9-10940X
Test#1 (Integers)
74.19k
485.37k (x6.54)
Test#2 (FP)
66.27k
472.7k (x7.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.97k
113.09k (x7.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
16.95k (x3.51)
TOTAL
161.26k
1088.11k (x6.75)

Performance/W
i5-8250U
i9-10940X
Test#1 (Integers)
4946 points/W
2942 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4418 points/W
2865 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1065 points/W
685 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
322 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
10751 points/W
6595 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8250U
i9-10940X
Test#1 (Integers)
6503 points/GHz
6197 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5777 points/GHz
5717 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
1210 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2361 points/GHz
1885 points/GHz
TOTAL
15975 points/GHz
15009 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4