Core i5-8250U vs i7-4820K
Description
The i5-8250U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-4820K is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 137.1 k points while the i7-4820K gets 134.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8250U is 1 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 137.1 k points while the i7-4820K gets 134.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8250U is 1 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
306e4
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Ivy Bridge -E
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2017
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
54.31k points
32.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
161.26k points
134.08k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-8250U
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
12.59k
11.85k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
18.89k
11.84k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.65k
4.69k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
4.12k (x0.5)
TOTAL
44.32k
32.49k (x0.73)
Multithread
i5-8250U
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
45.91k
47.65k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
69.55k
54.81k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.79k
21.56k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
10.05k (x2.08)
TOTAL
137.09k
134.08k (x0.98)
Performance/W
i5-8250U
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
3061 points/W
367 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4637 points/W
422 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1120 points/W
166 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
322 points/W
77 points/W
TOTAL
9139 points/W
1031 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8250U
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
3702 points/GHz
3039 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5556 points/GHz
3035 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1367 points/GHz
1201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2411 points/GHz
1056 points/GHz
TOTAL
13036 points/GHz
8331 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4