| | | | | | |

Core i5-8250U vs i7-4710HQ


Description
The i5-8250U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-4710HQ is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 161.3 k points while the i7-4710HQ gets 155.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-8250U is 1 times faster than the i7-4710HQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ea
306c3
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
4/8
4 /4
TDP
15 W
47 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2017
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
54.31k points
40.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
161.26k points
155.24k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8250U
i7-4710HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
22.11k
20.98k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
19.64k
10.48k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.54k
4.75k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.03k
4.44k (x0.55)
TOTAL
54.31k
40.65k (x0.75)

Multithread

i5-8250U

i7-4710HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
74.19k
77.73k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
66.27k
52.12k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.97k
20.55k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
4.85k (x1)
TOTAL
161.26k
155.24k (x0.96)

Performance/W
i5-8250U
i7-4710HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
4946 points/W
1654 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4418 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1065 points/W
437 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
322 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
10751 points/W
3303 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8250U
i7-4710HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
6503 points/GHz
5994 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5777 points/GHz
2993 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
1358 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2361 points/GHz
1269 points/GHz
TOTAL
15975 points/GHz
11614 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4