Core i5-8250U vs i7-2600
Description
The i5-8250U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-2600 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 137.1 k points while the i7-2600 gets 93.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8250U is 1.5 times faster than the i7-2600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 137.1 k points while the i7-2600 gets 93.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8250U is 1.5 times faster than the i7-2600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
206a7
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2017
June 2011
Mean monothread perf.
54.31k points
28.68k points
Mean multithread perf.
161.26k points
93.69k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-8250U
i7-2600
Test#1 (Integers)
12.59k
10.03k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
18.89k
8.91k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.65k
4.34k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
5.41k (x0.66)
TOTAL
44.32k
28.68k (x0.65)
Multithread
i5-8250U
i7-2600
Test#1 (Integers)
45.91k
37.69k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
69.55k
34.22k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.79k
17.65k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
4.13k (x0.86)
TOTAL
137.09k
93.69k (x0.68)
Performance/W
i5-8250U
i7-2600
Test#1 (Integers)
3061 points/W
397 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4637 points/W
360 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1120 points/W
186 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
322 points/W
43 points/W
TOTAL
9139 points/W
986 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8250U
i7-2600
Test#1 (Integers)
3702 points/GHz
2639 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5556 points/GHz
2343 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1367 points/GHz
1141 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2411 points/GHz
1425 points/GHz
TOTAL
13036 points/GHz
7549 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4