Core i5-8250U vs i5-3330
Description
The i5-8250U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-3330 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 137.1 k points while the i5-3330 gets 104.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8250U is 1.3 times faster than the i5-3330 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 137.1 k points while the i5-3330 gets 104.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8250U is 1.3 times faster than the i5-3330 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
306a9
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
77 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2017
September 2012
Mean monothread perf.
54.31k points
29.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
161.26k points
104.78k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-8250U
i5-3330
Test#1 (Integers)
12.59k
10.85k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
18.89k
10.47k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.65k
4.21k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
4.31k (x0.53)
TOTAL
44.32k
29.84k (x0.67)
Multithread
i5-8250U
i5-3330
Test#1 (Integers)
45.91k
41.77k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
69.55k
40.2k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.79k
16.11k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
6.7k (x1.39)
TOTAL
137.09k
104.78k (x0.76)
Performance/W
i5-8250U
i5-3330
Test#1 (Integers)
3061 points/W
542 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4637 points/W
522 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1120 points/W
209 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
322 points/W
87 points/W
TOTAL
9139 points/W
1361 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8250U
i5-3330
Test#1 (Integers)
3702 points/GHz
3390 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5556 points/GHz
3272 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1367 points/GHz
1316 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2411 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
TOTAL
13036 points/GHz
9325 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4