| | | | | | |

Core i5-8250U vs i5-2500


Description
The i5-8250U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-2500 is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 137.1 k points while the i5-2500 gets 86.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-8250U is 1.6 times faster than the i5-2500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ea
206a7
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2017
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
54.31k points
27.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
161.26k points
86.86k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-8250U
i5-2500
Test#1 (Integers)
12.59k
9.92k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
18.89k
8.8k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.65k
4.27k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
4.62k (x0.56)
TOTAL
44.32k
27.61k (x0.62)

Multithread

i5-8250U

i5-2500
Test#1 (Integers)
45.91k
35.79k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
69.55k
31.77k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.79k
15.5k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
3.8k (x0.79)
TOTAL
137.09k
86.86k (x0.63)

Performance/W
i5-8250U
i5-2500
Test#1 (Integers)
3061 points/W
377 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4637 points/W
334 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1120 points/W
163 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
322 points/W
40 points/W
TOTAL
9139 points/W
914 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8250U
i5-2500
Test#1 (Integers)
3702 points/GHz
2682 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5556 points/GHz
2377 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1367 points/GHz
1153 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2411 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
TOTAL
13036 points/GHz
7461 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4