Core i5-8250U vs i5-10210U
Description
The i5-8250U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 161.3 k points while the i5-10210U gets 147.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8250U is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 161.3 k points while the i5-10210U gets 147.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8250U is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
806ec
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2017
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
54.31k points
56.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
161.26k points
147.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8250U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.11k
22.96k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
19.64k
20.8k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.54k
4.76k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.03k
7.5k (x0.93)
TOTAL
54.31k
56.03k (x1.03)
Multithread
i5-8250U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
74.19k
66.43k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
66.27k
62.38k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.97k
14.52k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
4.45k (x0.92)
TOTAL
161.26k
147.78k (x0.92)
Performance/W
i5-8250U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
4946 points/W
4429 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4418 points/W
4158 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1065 points/W
968 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
322 points/W
297 points/W
TOTAL
10751 points/W
9852 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8250U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
6503 points/GHz
5468 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5777 points/GHz
4953 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
1134 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2361 points/GHz
1785 points/GHz
TOTAL
15975 points/GHz
13340 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4