| | | | | | |

Core i5-8250U vs i3-10100


Description
The i5-8250U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i3-10100 is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 161.3 k points while the i3-10100 gets 162.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100 is 1 times faster than the i5-8250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ea
a0653
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
54.31k points
55.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
161.26k points
162.33k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8250U
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
22.11k
22.74k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
19.64k
20.31k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.54k
4.71k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.03k
7.65k (x0.95)
TOTAL
54.31k
55.41k (x1.02)

Multithread

i5-8250U

i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
74.19k
71.95k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
66.27k
67.7k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.97k
16.43k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
6.25k (x1.29)
TOTAL
161.26k
162.33k (x1.01)

Performance/W
i5-8250U
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
4946 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4418 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1065 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
322 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
10751 points/W
2497 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8250U
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
6503 points/GHz
5288 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5777 points/GHz
4724 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
1095 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2361 points/GHz
1779 points/GHz
TOTAL
15975 points/GHz
12886 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4