| | | | | | |

Core i5-8250U vs Ryzen 7 1700X


Description
The i5-8250U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 1700X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 161.3 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700X is 2.3 times faster than the i5-8250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ea
800f11
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
August 2017
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
54.31k points
56.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
161.26k points
372.73k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-8250U
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
12.59k
12.5k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
18.89k
22.92k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.65k
5.45k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
14.72k (x1.8)
TOTAL
44.32k
55.59k (x1.25)

Multithread

i5-8250U

1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
45.91k
92.51k (x2.02)
Test#2 (FP)
69.55k
144.76k (x2.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.79k
54.43k (x3.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
22.08k (x4.57)
TOTAL
137.09k
313.78k (x2.29)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8250U
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
22.11k
13.72k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
19.64k
22.48k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.54k
5.12k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.03k
15.44k (x1.92)
TOTAL
54.31k
56.76k (x1.05)

Multithread

i5-8250U

1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
74.19k
110.92k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
66.27k
200.56k (x3.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.97k
54.24k (x3.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
7.01k (x1.45)
TOTAL
161.26k
372.73k (x2.31)

Performance/W
i5-8250U
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
4946 points/W
1168 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4418 points/W
2111 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1065 points/W
571 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
322 points/W
74 points/W
TOTAL
10751 points/W
3923 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8250U
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6503 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5777 points/GHz
5916 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2361 points/GHz
4063 points/GHz
TOTAL
15975 points/GHz
14938 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4