Core i5-8250U vs Ryzen 5 1600
Description
The i5-8250U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 161.3 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.7 times faster than the i5-8250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 161.3 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.7 times faster than the i5-8250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
800f11
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
August 2017
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
54.31k points
56.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
161.26k points
272.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8250U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
22.11k
13.67k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
19.64k
22.28k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.54k
4.99k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.03k
15.22k (x1.9)
TOTAL
54.31k
56.16k (x1.03)
Multithread
i5-8250U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
74.19k
81.03k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
66.27k
145.84k (x2.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.97k
39.14k (x2.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
6.79k (x1.41)
TOTAL
161.26k
272.8k (x1.69)
Performance/W
i5-8250U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
4946 points/W
1247 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4418 points/W
2244 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1065 points/W
602 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
322 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
10751 points/W
4197 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8250U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
6503 points/GHz
3797 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5777 points/GHz
6189 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
1387 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2361 points/GHz
4228 points/GHz
TOTAL
15975 points/GHz
15601 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4