Core i5-8250U vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The i5-8250U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 161.3 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1 times faster than the i5-8250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 161.3 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1 times faster than the i5-8250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
810f81
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Picasso
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2017
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
54.31k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
161.26k points
168.69k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-8250U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3.32k
3.89k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
13.5k
17.94k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.11k
5.34k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.42k
6.62k (x0.89)
TOTAL
28.34k
33.79k (x1.19)
Multithread
i5-8250U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
13.97k
15.07k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
50.8k
66.84k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.71k
19.56k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.76k
6.54k (x1.37)
TOTAL
84.24k
108.01k (x1.28)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-8250U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
12.41k
14.3k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
18.11k
21.69k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.79k
5.42k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.16k
6.6k (x0.81)
TOTAL
43.46k
48k (x1.1)
Multithread
i5-8250U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
42.48k
55.45k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
60.2k
83.13k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.85k
20.76k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
6.58k (x1.38)
TOTAL
122.3k
165.91k (x1.36)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-8250U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
12.59k
13.05k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
18.89k
22.88k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.65k
5.39k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
7.31k (x0.89)
TOTAL
44.32k
48.63k (x1.1)
Multithread
i5-8250U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
45.91k
51.73k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
69.55k
87.74k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.79k
20.74k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
6.57k (x1.36)
TOTAL
137.09k
166.79k (x1.22)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8250U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
22.11k
14.48k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
19.64k
23.84k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.54k
5.43k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.03k
5.46k (x0.68)
TOTAL
54.31k
49.21k (x0.91)
Multithread
i5-8250U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
74.19k
54.39k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
66.27k
88.77k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.97k
20.04k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
5.48k (x1.13)
TOTAL
161.26k
168.69k (x1.05)
Performance/W
i5-8250U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
4946 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4418 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1065 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
322 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
10751 points/W
2595 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8250U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
6503 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5777 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2361 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
15975 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4