Core i5-8250U vs FX 8350
Description
The i5-8250U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 8350 is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 137.1 k points while the 8350 gets 118.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8250U is 1.2 times faster than the 8350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 137.1 k points while the 8350 gets 118.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8250U is 1.2 times faster than the 8350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
600f20
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Vishera
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/8
TDP
15 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2017
October 2012
Mean monothread perf.
54.31k points
28.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
161.26k points
118.14k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-8250U
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
12.59k
9.85k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
18.89k
8.41k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.65k
3.58k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
6.32k (x0.77)
TOTAL
44.32k
28.16k (x0.64)
Multithread
i5-8250U
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
45.91k
44.93k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
69.55k
45.21k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.79k
22.81k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
5.19k (x1.07)
TOTAL
137.09k
118.14k (x0.86)
Performance/W
i5-8250U
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
3061 points/W
359 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4637 points/W
362 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1120 points/W
182 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
322 points/W
42 points/W
TOTAL
9139 points/W
945 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8250U
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
3702 points/GHz
2402 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5556 points/GHz
2050 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1367 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2411 points/GHz
1541 points/GHz
TOTAL
13036 points/GHz
6867 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4