| | | | | | |

Core i5-7500 vs Xeon Bronze 3206R


Description
The i5-7500 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7500 gets a score of 191.7 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.

Summarizing, the 3206R is 1.1 times faster than the i5-7500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
50657
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Cascade Lake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/8
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
11264 kB
Date
September 2016
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
61.51k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
191.71k points
216.02k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-7500
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
3.87k
1.97k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
16.09k
8.15k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.11k
2.37k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.97k
4.84k (x0.61)
TOTAL
33.04k
17.32k (x0.52)

Multithread

i5-7500

3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
14.81k
15.73k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
61.51k
64.78k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.59k
18.06k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.68k
5.21k (x1.41)
TOTAL
99.59k
103.77k (x1.04)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7500
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
25.59k
12.92k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
22.57k
10.97k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
2.54k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.08k
5.09k (x0.63)
TOTAL
61.51k
31.52k (x0.51)

Multithread

i5-7500

3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
88.3k
103.33k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
78.59k
87.67k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.72k
20.1k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.1k
4.91k (x0.96)
TOTAL
191.71k
216.02k (x1.13)

Performance/W
i5-7500
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
1358 points/W
1216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1209 points/W
1031 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
303 points/W
237 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
2949 points/W
2541 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7500
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
6734 points/GHz
6801 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5939 points/GHz
5774 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1387 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2125 points/GHz
2678 points/GHz
TOTAL
16186 points/GHz
16588 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4