| | | | | | |

Core i5-7500 vs i7-1065G7


Description
The i5-7500 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7500 gets a score of 191.7 k points while the i7-1065G7 gets 214.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1065G7 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-7500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
706e5
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2016
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
61.51k points
74.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
191.71k points
214.34k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7500
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
25.59k
28.19k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
22.57k
22.13k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
10.32k (x1.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.08k
14.17k (x1.75)
TOTAL
61.51k
74.82k (x1.22)

Multithread

i5-7500

i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
88.3k
86.39k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
78.59k
86.22k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.72k
32.99k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.1k
8.75k (x1.71)
TOTAL
191.71k
214.34k (x1.12)

Performance/W
i5-7500
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1358 points/W
5759 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1209 points/W
5748 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
303 points/W
2199 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
583 points/W
TOTAL
2949 points/W
14289 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7500
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6734 points/GHz
7229 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5939 points/GHz
5675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1387 points/GHz
2646 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2125 points/GHz
3634 points/GHz
TOTAL
16186 points/GHz
19184 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4