Core i5-7500 vs i5-10210U
Description
The i5-7500 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7500 gets a score of 191.7 k points while the i5-10210U gets 147.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7500 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7500 gets a score of 191.7 k points while the i5-10210U gets 147.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7500 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
806ec
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2016
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
61.51k points
56.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
191.71k points
147.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7500
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.59k
22.96k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
22.57k
20.8k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
4.76k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.08k
7.5k (x0.93)
TOTAL
61.51k
56.03k (x0.91)
Multithread
i5-7500
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
88.3k
66.43k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
78.59k
62.38k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.72k
14.52k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.1k
4.45k (x0.87)
TOTAL
191.71k
147.78k (x0.77)
Performance/W
i5-7500
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
1358 points/W
4429 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1209 points/W
4158 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
303 points/W
968 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
297 points/W
TOTAL
2949 points/W
9852 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7500
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
6734 points/GHz
5468 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5939 points/GHz
4953 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1387 points/GHz
1134 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2125 points/GHz
1785 points/GHz
TOTAL
16186 points/GHz
13340 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4