Core i5-7500 vs Ryzen 3 3350U
Description
The i5-7500 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3350U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7500 gets a score of 191.7 k points while the 3350U gets 144.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7500 is 1.3 times faster than the 3350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7500 gets a score of 191.7 k points while the 3350U gets 144.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7500 is 1.3 times faster than the 3350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
810f81
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2016
March 2019
Mean monothread perf.
61.51k points
43.7k points
Mean multithread perf.
191.71k points
144.84k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7500
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.59k
13.25k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
22.57k
21.67k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
4.79k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.08k
3.98k (x0.49)
TOTAL
61.51k
43.7k (x0.71)
Multithread
i5-7500
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
88.3k
46.47k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
78.59k
78.38k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.72k
16.69k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.1k
3.3k (x0.65)
TOTAL
191.71k
144.84k (x0.76)
Performance/W
i5-7500
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
1358 points/W
3098 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1209 points/W
5225 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
303 points/W
1113 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
2949 points/W
9656 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7500
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
6734 points/GHz
3787 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5939 points/GHz
6191 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1387 points/GHz
1369 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2125 points/GHz
1138 points/GHz
TOTAL
16186 points/GHz
12485 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4