| | | | | | |

Core i5-7500 vs Ryzen 3 2200G


Description
The i5-7500 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 2200G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7500 gets a score of 191.7 k points while the 2200G gets 157.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7500 is 1.2 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
810f10
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2016
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
61.51k points
44.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
191.71k points
157.54k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7500
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
25.59k
13.75k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
22.57k
22.58k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
4.99k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.08k
3.55k (x0.44)
TOTAL
61.51k
44.87k (x0.73)

Multithread

i5-7500

2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
88.3k
50.99k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
78.59k
84.4k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.72k
18.95k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.1k
3.2k (x0.63)
TOTAL
191.71k
157.54k (x0.82)

Performance/W
i5-7500
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
1358 points/W
785 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1209 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
303 points/W
292 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
49 points/W
TOTAL
2949 points/W
2424 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7500
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
6734 points/GHz
3716 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5939 points/GHz
6102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1387 points/GHz
1350 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2125 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
TOTAL
16186 points/GHz
12126 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4