Core i5-7500 vs A6 9210
Description
The i5-7500 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 9210 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7500 gets a score of 149.8 k points while the 9210 gets 27.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7500 is 5.5 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7500 gets a score of 149.8 k points while the 9210 gets 27.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7500 is 5.5 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
670f00
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
1x96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
0 kB
Date
September 2016
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
61.51k points
20.78k points
Mean multithread perf.
191.71k points
27.13k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7500
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
14.09k
4.87k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
19.8k
10.38k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
2.59k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.45k
2.38k (x0.28)
TOTAL
47.67k
20.22k (x0.42)
Multithread
i5-7500
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
53.99k
7.41k (x0.14)
Test#2 (FP)
77.43k
11.87k (x0.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.81k
3.35k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
2.6k (x1.03)
TOTAL
154.77k
25.23k (x0.16)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7500
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
14.03k
4.71k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
21.07k
11.03k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.15k
2.59k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.77k
2.45k (x0.31)
TOTAL
48.03k
20.78k (x0.43)
Multithread
i5-7500
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
50.12k
8.43k (x0.17)
Test#2 (FP)
74.8k
12.8k (x0.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.69k
3.32k (x0.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.19k
2.59k (x0.5)
TOTAL
149.79k
27.13k (x0.18)
Performance/W
i5-7500
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
771 points/W
562 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1151 points/W
853 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
303 points/W
221 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
80 points/W
172 points/W
TOTAL
2305 points/W
1809 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7500
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
3693 points/GHz
1683 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5545 points/GHz
3938 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1356 points/GHz
927 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2044 points/GHz
873 points/GHz
TOTAL
12639 points/GHz
7420 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4