Core i5-7400T vs Xeon E3-1220 v3
Description
The i5-7400T is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the E3-1220 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7400T gets a score of 163.4 k points while the E3-1220 v3 gets 140.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7400T is 1.2 times faster than the E3-1220 v3 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7400T gets a score of 163.4 k points while the E3-1220 v3 gets 140.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7400T is 1.2 times faster than the E3-1220 v3 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
306c3
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Haswell-WS
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/4
4 /4
TDP
35 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2017
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
49.16k points
39.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
163.4k points
140.76k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7400T
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
19.7k
19.17k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
17.29k
10.55k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.07k
4.79k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.1k
4.65k (x0.57)
TOTAL
49.16k
39.16k (x0.8)
Multithread
i5-7400T
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
75.27k
73.13k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
66.24k
42.06k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.93k
18.03k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.95k
7.54k (x0.95)
TOTAL
163.4k
140.76k (x0.86)
Performance/W
i5-7400T
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2151 points/W
914 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1893 points/W
526 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
398 points/W
225 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
227 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
4669 points/W
1759 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7400T
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6568 points/GHz
5478 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5764 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1356 points/GHz
1368 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2700 points/GHz
1328 points/GHz
TOTAL
16388 points/GHz
11188 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4