Core i5-7400T vs i5-10400F
Description
The i5-7400T is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7400T gets a score of 163.4 k points while the i5-10400F gets 370 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 2.3 times faster than the i5-7400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7400T gets a score of 163.4 k points while the i5-10400F gets 370 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 2.3 times faster than the i5-7400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
a0653
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
49.16k points
68.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
163.4k points
369.97k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7400T
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
19.7k
26.28k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
17.29k
23.38k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.07k
5.52k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.1k
12.96k (x1.6)
TOTAL
49.16k
68.14k (x1.39)
Multithread
i5-7400T
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
75.27k
163.67k (x2.17)
Test#2 (FP)
66.24k
159.74k (x2.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.93k
39k (x2.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.95k
7.56k (x0.95)
TOTAL
163.4k
369.97k (x2.26)
Performance/W
i5-7400T
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2151 points/W
2518 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1893 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
398 points/W
600 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
227 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
4669 points/W
5692 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7400T
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6568 points/GHz
6112 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5764 points/GHz
5438 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1356 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2700 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
TOTAL
16388 points/GHz
15847 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4