| | | | | | |

Core i5-7400T vs i3-8130U


Description
Both models i5-7400T and i3-8130U are based on Kaby Lake architecture.

The first Kaby Lake CPU was released in August 2016. It uses a 14 nm process and was the first architecture in breaking the previous tick-tock model. Actually, it is not that different from the preceding Skylake: it has 64kB of L1 cache and 256kB L2 cache per core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7400T gets a score of 163.4 k points while the i3-8130U gets 88.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7400T is 1.9 times faster than the i3-8130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
806ea
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Kaby Lake-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2017
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
49.16k points
47.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
163.4k points
88.35k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7400T
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.7k
21.09k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
17.29k
19.41k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.07k
4.05k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.1k
2.8k (x0.35)
TOTAL
49.16k
47.35k (x0.96)

Multithread

i5-7400T

i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
75.27k
38.23k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
66.24k
38.89k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.93k
8.75k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.95k
2.47k (x0.31)
TOTAL
163.4k
88.35k (x0.54)

Performance/W
i5-7400T
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
2151 points/W
2549 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1893 points/W
2593 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
398 points/W
584 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
227 points/W
165 points/W
TOTAL
4669 points/W
5890 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7400T
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
6568 points/GHz
6204 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5764 points/GHz
5708 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1356 points/GHz
1190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2700 points/GHz
823 points/GHz
TOTAL
16388 points/GHz
13925 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4