Core i5-7400T vs i3-10100T
Description
The i5-7400T is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7400T gets a score of 163.4 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.4 times faster than the i5-7400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7400T gets a score of 163.4 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.4 times faster than the i5-7400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
a0653
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
49.16k points
60.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
163.4k points
227.67k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7400T
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
19.7k
24.31k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
17.29k
22.15k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.07k
5.14k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.1k
8.46k (x1.04)
TOTAL
49.16k
60.06k (x1.22)
Multithread
i5-7400T
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
75.27k
101.48k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
66.24k
98.04k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.93k
24.28k (x1.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.95k
3.86k (x0.49)
TOTAL
163.4k
227.67k (x1.39)
Performance/W
i5-7400T
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
2151 points/W
1561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1893 points/W
1508 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
398 points/W
374 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
227 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
4669 points/W
3503 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7400T
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
6568 points/GHz
5653 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5764 points/GHz
5150 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1356 points/GHz
1196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2700 points/GHz
1967 points/GHz
TOTAL
16388 points/GHz
13967 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4