Core i5-7400T vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
Description
The i5-7400T is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 4900HS is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7400T gets a score of 163.4 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 2.2 times faster than the i5-7400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7400T gets a score of 163.4 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 2.2 times faster than the i5-7400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
860f01
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Renoir
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
January 2017
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
49.16k points
53k points
Mean multithread perf.
163.4k points
360.57k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7400T
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
19.7k
14.87k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
17.29k
21.53k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.07k
8.39k (x2.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.1k
8.21k (x1.01)
TOTAL
49.16k
53k (x1.08)
Multithread
i5-7400T
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
75.27k
124.63k (x1.66)
Test#2 (FP)
66.24k
158.62k (x2.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.93k
69.79k (x5.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.95k
7.53k (x0.95)
TOTAL
163.4k
360.57k (x2.21)
Performance/W
i5-7400T
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
2151 points/W
3561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1893 points/W
4532 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
398 points/W
1994 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
227 points/W
215 points/W
TOTAL
4669 points/W
10302 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7400T
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
6568 points/GHz
3457 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5764 points/GHz
5007 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1356 points/GHz
1952 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2700 points/GHz
1910 points/GHz
TOTAL
16388 points/GHz
12326 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4