Core i5-7400T vs Ryzen 3 2200U
Description
The i5-7400T is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7400T gets a score of 163.4 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7400T is 2.3 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7400T gets a score of 163.4 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7400T is 2.3 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
810f10
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2017
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
49.16k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
163.4k points
71.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7400T
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.7k
10.73k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
17.29k
18.15k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.07k
3.99k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.1k
3.89k (x0.48)
TOTAL
49.16k
36.77k (x0.75)
Multithread
i5-7400T
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
75.27k
20.11k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
66.24k
36.87k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.93k
10.74k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.95k
3.31k (x0.42)
TOTAL
163.4k
71.02k (x0.43)
Performance/W
i5-7400T
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2151 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1893 points/W
2458 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
398 points/W
716 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
227 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
4669 points/W
4735 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7400T
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6568 points/GHz
3157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5764 points/GHz
5338 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1356 points/GHz
1175 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2700 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
16388 points/GHz
10814 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4