| | | | | | |

Core i5-7400 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4


Description
The i5-7400 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7400 gets a score of 173.7 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-7400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
406f1
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
20480 kB
Date
September 2016
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.7k points
237.83k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7400
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
12.72k
6.04k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
19.3k
10.18k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
2.74k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.73k
2.41k (x0.28)
TOTAL
45.52k
21.37k (x0.47)

Multithread

i5-7400

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
47.95k
47.51k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
71.98k
75.12k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.22k
19.72k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.03k
5.45k (x0.68)
TOTAL
145.18k
147.8k (x1.02)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7400
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
22.37k
12.16k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
19.46k
11.82k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.44k
3.02k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.41k
2.4k (x0.37)
TOTAL
52.69k
29.39k (x0.56)

Multithread

i5-7400

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
79.57k
103.77k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
71.41k
102.28k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.44k
26.13k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.27k
5.65k (x0.9)
TOTAL
173.7k
237.83k (x1.37)

Performance/W
i5-7400
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
1224 points/W
1221 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1099 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
253 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
96 points/W
66 points/W
TOTAL
2672 points/W
2798 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7400
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
6392 points/GHz
4054 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5561 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1267 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1832 points/GHz
799 points/GHz
TOTAL
15053 points/GHz
9798 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4